Wednesday April 28, 2010
A- lines not as safe either!
Background: Arterial catheters are considered at lower risk for catheter-related infection than central venous catheters in the absence of conclusive evidence. Study was to compare the daily risk and risk factors for colonization and catheter-related infection between arterial catheters and central venous catheters.
Methods: We used data from a trial of seven intensive care units evaluating different dressing change intervals and a chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge. We determined the daily hazard rate and identified risk factors for colonization using a marginal Cox model for clustered data.
Results: We included 3532 catheters and 27,541 catheter-days.
- Colonization rates did not differ between arterial catheters and central venous catheters (7.9% vs 9.6%)
- Arterial catheter and central venous catheter catheter-related infection rates were 0.68% and 0.94% respectively.
- The daily hazard rate for colonization increased steadily over time for arterial catheters (p = .008) but remained stable for central venous catheters.
- Independent risk factors for arterial catheter colonization were respiratory failure and femoral insertion
- Independent risk factors for central venous catheter colonization were trauma or absence of septic shock at intensive care unit admission, femoral or jugular insertion, and absence of antibiotic treatment at central venous catheter insertion
Infectious risk associated with arterial catheters compared with central venous catheters - Critical Care Medicine. 38(4):1030-1035, April 2010.
